Kwame Nkrumah (1909-1972)

Kwame Nkrumah became the first prime and later president of Ghana. Kwame was the leader of Ghana. Until he was deposed by a coup d'état in 1966, he was a major spokesman for modern Africa. His mission, he claimed, was to "civilise" Africa. He saw the solution to African problems in African unity.

 

Kwame was born on September 21, 1909, at Nkroful the then British-ruled Gold Coast, a son of a goldsmith. Trained as a teacher, he went to the United States in 1935 for advanced studies and continued his schooling in England, where he helped organize the Pan-African Congress in 1945. He returned to Ghana in 1947. A series of meetings with the leadership of the United Gold Coast Convention, (UGCC), founded on 4 August, 1947, and lead by Dr. J. B. Danquah, resulted, on 20 January, 1948, in the appointment of Nkrumah as General Secretary of the Party.

Nkrumah began an intense speaking tour throughout the country, and with his unique, impassioned rhetoric, soon had the entire country seething with Pan-African enthusiasm and demands for self-rule. Boycotts of European goods were initiated; labor strikes became commonplace and work slowdowns began in all areas of the Gold Coast's commerce and industry.

The 28th of February 1948 was a landmark day in the nation's history. Sixty-three former loyal soldiers lay dead or badly wounded on the streets of Accra. This was after a large contingent of former servicemen who were tired of unfulfilled promises by the government, drafted a petition seeking redress of grievances for presentation to H.M's Governor, Sir Gerald Creasy, were killed. Rioting and looting lasted for five days.

On 1 March 1948, Governor Creasy declared a state of emergency. Strict press censorship was imposed over the entire country. On 12 March, the Governor issued Removal Orders and police were dispatched to pick up and arrest the entire UGCC Central Executive; Kwame Nkrumah, Dr. Danquah, E. Akufo Addo, William Ofori Atta, E. Obelsebi Lamptey and E. Ako Adjei were arrested, detained and exiled to the Northern Territories.

On 14 March 1948, Cape Coast students demonstrated, demanding the release of the Party leadership. Once again, the government responded with great force, leaving the dead and dying in its wake. Upset by the events in Ghana, the Colonial Office in London, appointed a Commission, chaired by Mr. A. K. Watson, Recorder of Bury St. Edmunds, to investigate the reasons for the disturbances and to make recommendations for the continued governance of the colony.

On 12 April 1948, the Party leadership was released from detention, when Governor Creasy finally acceded to demands. On 19 April, he lifted the 1-½ month press ban.  Much as these actions served to superficially quiet the country, but it did nothing to flourishing and rampant demand for self-rule. On 26 April 1948, the Watson Commission concluded its deliberations and recommended was that a Constitution be drafted as a possible prelude to eventual self-rule. To that end, an all African Constitutional Committee was appointed under the Chairmanship of an esteemed African jurist, Mr. Justice Henley Coussey of the Gold Coast High Court.

In the meantime, Nkrumah toured the country addressing huge crowds advocating for self-government, even among the youth. On 26 February 1949, he announced the formation of the Committee on Youth Organization (CYO) designed to bring young people into active politics. Following a rebuke of the membership for not working hard enough and failure to support his vision of self-rule, Nkrumah tendered his resignation as General Secretary of the party. On 12 June 1949, at a CYO rally in Accra, Nkrumah announced the formation of the Convention Peoples Party (CPP), therefore splitting from the United Gold Coast Convention.

On 7 November 1949, the Coussey Committee Report was published but fell short of a recommendation for self-rule.  Consequently, Nkrumah announced formation of the Ghana Representative Council (GRC) as the principal body to initiate appeal against the report. Plans were announced for a nationwide Positive Action strike to begin 1 January 1950. He renewed his nationwide tour, calling for self-government.

New Years Day, 1950, dawned with labor shutdowns in every industrial and commercial facility. Government responded immediately with a State of Emergency announced by the Governor. Following this, more than 200 CPP and CYO leaders, including Nkrumah were arrested. The arrests and detentions did not stop the movement. Enough people stepped into the leadership void to perpetuate the movement. The "Gold Coast Leader" was initiated, first as a sub-rosa broadsheet and within a month, as a widely distributed CPP propaganda newspaper.

In the meantime, the government accepted the Coussey Committee report and began implementing its recommendations, beginning with municipal elections in Accra on 8 April 1950, Cape Coast on 12 June 1950 and Kumasi on 4 November 1950. CPP won in a landslide. Although still in prison, Nkrumah recorded an extraordinary plurality of 22,780 votes out of 23,122 votes cast. When Nkrumah’s CPP swept the 1951 elections, he was freed to form a government, and led the colony to independence as Ghana in 1957.

A firm believer in African liberation, Nkrumah pursued a radical pan-African policy, playing a key role in the formation of the Organization of African Unity in 1963. As head of government, he was less successful however, and as time passed he was accused of forming a dictatorship. In 1964 he formed a one-party state, with himself as president for life. He was overthrown by the military in 1966, with the help of western backing and spent his last years in exile. He died in Bucharest, Romania, on April 27, 1972. His legacy and dream of a "United States of African" still remains a goal among many.

Nkrumah was the motivating force behind the movement for the independence of Ghana.  His numerous writings address Africa's political destiny. The following discusses his objectives for Africa and issues for the organization of government there.

 Kwame’s dream of a united Africa is best exemplified in his writings in  I Speak of Freedom: A Statement of African Ideology” (London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1961), pp. xi-xiv.). He posited,

 

“ Divided we are weak; united, Africa could become one of the greatest forces for good in the world. Although most Africans are poor, our continent is potentially extremely rich. …. This is one of the reasons why we have in Africa the paradox of poverty in the midst of plenty, and scarcity in the midst of abundance.  Never before have a people had within their grasp so great an opportunity for developing a continent endowed with so much wealth. Individually, the independent states of Africa, some of them potentially rich, others poor, can do little for their people. Together, by mutual help, they can achieve much. But the economic development of the continent must be planned and pursued as a whole. A loose confederation designed only for economic co-operation would not provide the necessary unity of purpose. Only a strong political union can bring about full and effective development of our natural resources for the benefit of our people…..

 

If the need for political union is agreed by us all, then the will to create it is born; and where there's a will there's a way.  The present leaders of Africa have already shown a remarkable willingness to consult and seek advice among themselves. Africans have, indeed, begun to think continentally. They realise that they have much in common, both in their past history, in their present problems and in their future hopes. To suggest that the time is not yet ripe for considering a political union of Africans is to evade the facts and ignore realities in Africa today…….. In my view, therefore, a united Africa – that is, the political and economic unification of the African Continent – should seek three objectives.

Firstly, we should have an over-all economic planning on a continental basis. This would increase the industrial and economic power of Africa. So long as we remain balkanized, regionally or territorially, we shall be at the mercy of colonialism and imperialism. The lesson of the South American Republics vis-á-vis the strength and solidarity of the United States of America is there for all to see.

Secondly, we should aim at the establishment of a unified military and defense strategy. I do not see much virtue or wisdom in our separate efforts to build up or maintain vast military forces for self-defense, which, in any case, would be ineffective in any major attack upon our separate states. If we examine this problem realistically, we should be able to ask ourselves this pertinent question: which single state in Africa today can protect its sovereignty against an imperialist aggressor?

The third objective which we should have in Africa stems from the first two which I have just described . . . a unified foreign policy and diplomacy to give political direction to our joint efforts for the protection and economic development of our continent . . . The desirability of a common foreign policy which will enable us to speak with one voice in the councils of the world, is so obvious, vital and imperative that comment is hardly necessary.

The emergence of such a mighty stabilising force in this strife-worn world should be regarded not as the shadowy dream of a visionary, but as a practical proposition, which the peoples of Africa can, and should, translate into reality. There is a tide in the affairs of every people when the moment strikes for political action. Such was the moment in the history of the United States of America when the Founding Fathers saw beyond the petty wranglings of the separate states and created a Union. This is our chance. We must act now. Tomorrow may be too late and the opportunity will have passed, and with it the hope of free Africa's survival.“